Benefit
Benefit-to-cost estimates for dynamic pricing applications on freeway shoulder lanes ranged from 1.1 to 8.2.
Mn/DOT experience with managed lanes
September 2010
Minneapolis-St. Paul,Minnesota,United States
Summary Information
In 2005, Mn/DOT completed a Phase I study that examined the conversion of high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes to high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes on I-394 and I-35W in Minneapolis-St.Paul. In 2010, a second study was conducted to examine the concept of implementing dynamic pricing on shoulder lanes to provide additional capacity with minimal impacts and changes to the overall roadway footprint. These new MnPASS lanes would run parallel to general purpose lanes and require all vehicles except transit to pay tolls. Price would increase with volume to maintain free-flow conditions.
A sketch-level benefit-to-cost analysis was conducted to estimate system impacts. The analysis assumed that capital costs would be incurred by 2014, the system would be operational by 2015, and benefits would increase at a rate of 1.2 percent per year to match estimates for increased traffic demand.
Benefits included vehicle operating and maintenance benefits (calculated from the system VMT changes output from the travel demand model) and travel time savings (calculated from the system VHT changes from the model). Cost variables on each corridor included capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, and salvage costs. The capital cost, however, was the primary cost driver for the benefit-to-cost analysis. Benefits were primarily derived from travel time savings measured as the reduction in vehicle-hours traveled for both general purpose and managed lanes in each corridor.
The analysis included the following constraints and assumptions.
A sketch-level benefit-to-cost analysis was conducted to estimate system impacts. The analysis assumed that capital costs would be incurred by 2014, the system would be operational by 2015, and benefits would increase at a rate of 1.2 percent per year to match estimates for increased traffic demand.
Benefits included vehicle operating and maintenance benefits (calculated from the system VMT changes output from the travel demand model) and travel time savings (calculated from the system VHT changes from the model). Cost variables on each corridor included capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, and salvage costs. The capital cost, however, was the primary cost driver for the benefit-to-cost analysis. Benefits were primarily derived from travel time savings measured as the reduction in vehicle-hours traveled for both general purpose and managed lanes in each corridor.
The analysis included the following constraints and assumptions.
- Auto Value of Time (per hour) = $13.59
- Truck Value of Time (per hour) = $17.08
- Auto Vehicle Operating Cost (per mile) = $0.26
- Truck Vehicle Operation Cost (per mile) = $0.71
- Vehicle Occupancy (per vehicle) = 1.35
- Discount Factor = 2.9%
- Inflation Rate = 3.0%
- Evaluation Period = 20 years
- Annual O&M Costs (toll collection and enforcement)= $50,000 per mile
- Major Structures = 60 years
- Grading and Drainage = 50 years
- Sub-Base and Base = 40 years
- Surface = 25 years
FINDINGS
Based on estimated system impacts and projected changes in travel demand over a 20 year period benefit-to-cost ratios ranged from 1.1 to 8.2 depending on corridor design. Longer corridors typically had higher benefit-to-cost ratios.
The table below excerpted from the source report details the benefit-to-cost estimates for each corridor.

Costs (2010 Dollars)Benefits
Corridor LengthCapitalAnnual
OperatingSalvageTotal 20-
Year Costs
(Discounted)Time Savings
(2015)Vehicle
Operating
Costs (2015)Total 20-Year
Benefits
(Discounted)B/C1A. TH 36: I-35W to I-35E 5.0$47.5$0.25-$19.0$36.2$4.8-$0.3$67.41.92. I-94: TH 101 to I-494 9.0$82.5$0.45-$30.1$64.4$5.0-$0.4$68.61.13A. I-35E:I-94 to TH 36 3.9$82.5$0.20-$33.1$59.5$11.2-$0.5$158.52.73B. I-35E: TH 36 to CR E 3.8$35.0$0.19-$13.3$27.1$3.0-$0.2$41.01.54A. I-35W: DT Minneapolis to TH 36 5.3$105.0$0.27-$42.9$75.6$15.2-$1.1$209.62.84B. I-35W: TH 36 to Blaine 10.8$155.0$0.54-$58.6$116.0$29.8-$1.5$420.13.65A. I-494: TH 212 to I-394 7.6$97.5$0.38-$35.8$74.0$11.3-$1.1$151.32.05B. I-494: I-394 to I-94 8.5$61.0$0.43-$27.1$46.4$15.0-$1.0$208.24.56A. TH 169: CR 17 to I-494 10.0$97.5$0.50-$34.7$76.2$42.1$0.1$627.48.27. TH 77: 141st Street to Old Shakopee Rd 6.9$41.0$0.35-$22.3$30.0$7.0-$0.2$101.73.410. I-494: TH 212 to MSP Airport 10.6$167.5$0.53-$58.1$127.3$55,6-$2.1$795.86.32. I-94: TH 101 to I-494
5B. I-494: I-394 to I-9417.5$192.5$0.88-$76.3$145.0$23.3-$1.8$319.82.21A. TH 36: I-35W to I-35E
4B. I-35W: TH 36 to Blaine
4A. I-35W: DT Minneapolis to TH 3621.1$377.5$1.06-$139.5280.6$54.1-$3.7$750.02.78A. I-94: DT Minneapolis to TH 280
8B. I-94: TH 280 to DT St. Paul8.1$140.0$0.41-$69.5$95.3$25.9-$2.0$355.13.73A. I-35E: I-94 to TH 36
3B. I-35E: TH 36 to CR E7.7$117.5$0.39-$38.3$86.6$14.0-$0.9$195.22.2
Goal Areas
Typical Deployment Locations
Metropolitan Areas
Keywords
congestion pricing, value pricing, variable road pricing, managed lanes
Benefit ID: 2011-00777

Benefit Comments
No comments posted to date