A simulation study found that adaptive signal control reduced delay by 18 to 20 percent when compared to fixed-timed signal control.
Comparing both signal control systems under conditions of perfect knowledge, the study found that adaptive control outperformed pre-timed signal plans across each of four traffic flow variation scenarios tested, resulting in 18 to 20 percent less delay. Under conditions of imperfect knowledge of traffic flow, representing varying levels of sensor deployment to monitor vehicles, the study found that adaptive signal control consistently outperformed pre-timed plans developed without knowledge of the traffic flows. The marginal benefit of adaptive signal control declined as traffic volumes increased, likely due to the ability of adaptive signal control to accommodate the greater fluctuations of demand during low volume scenarios. The authors noted that this was an exploratory simulation of adaptive signal control to establish a theoretical ceiling benchmark of adaptive signal control under conditions of perfect knowledge. They further noted that the study could be improved with better simulation of actual traffic conditions including multilane approaches and interactions between vehicles.
Realizing Benefits of Adaptive Signal Control at an Isolated Intersection
Author: Park, Brian and Myungsoon Chang
Published By: Paper presented at the 81st Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting. Washington, District of Columbia
Source Date: 13-17 January 2002
Average User Rating
Typical Deployment Locations
traffic signals, adaptive signals, pre-timed, pretimed, time-of-day signal timing