Use a bi-national stakeholder forum to help apply ITS technology at an international border crossing.
A public-private partnership experience in deploying a bi-national electronic truck border crossing system at the Washington /British Columbia border.
The evaluation report for the project and input from the project manager suggest the following:
- Use a stakeholder group to facilitate discussion, gain buy-in, and help reduce complicated institutional issues while applying technology systems at an international border
- Include in the stakeholder group both public and private organizations that have an interest in border operations. This will include organizations from both sides of the border.
- Recognize that a border stakeholder group will be most effective at addressing regional and state-level technical issues, as opposed to national level issues. A group such as the IMTC also cannot be expected to greatly affect national-level border policies.
- Take advantage of the ability of border stakeholder groups such as the IMTC to raise funds for ITS projects. These funds can come from both sides of the border.
As an example of IMTC’s role in this project, the IMTC and project stakeholders successfully addressed concerns related to the freight data privacy of the border ITS system by providing coordination among a range of diverse public and private agencies. The border ITS for trucks needed to provide security for both proprietary and law enforcement information while still being open to the public and private IMTC stakeholders. Project staff, using stakeholder contacts developed within the IMTC framework, resolved this potentially difficult issue by developing a password protected system that allowed users to gain secure access only to the user’s specified, authorized trade corridor information. Only border enforcement agencies and the system administrator have global access to freight information for each company using the system. It is only with the input and approval from all organizations involved in the project that allowed this solution to have been developed.
The IMTC partnership also facilitated open discussions between the customs agencies of the United States and Canada at the Blaine-Surrey international crossing. These discussions, as well as discussions at the national level of both countries, may lead to joint facilities soon being deployed at the border. Co-location of inspection agencies would allow economies of scale, greater coordination of inspection efforts, and direct, on-site communication between U.S. and Canadian customs. This would, in turn, greatly reduce some of the engineering and institutional complications related to the installation of ITS technology at the U.S.-Canadian border.
However, a regionally oriented stakeholder organization such as the IMTC cannot be expected to greatly influence national-level border technology issues. For example, there is a concern about dedicated, short-range communication (DSRC) standards, the primary issue being more uniformity in transponder interoperability to preclude motor carriers from having to equip their vehicles with several transponders. However, transponder standards are a national-level issue, and input from the IMTC is not expected to have a notable impact on this issue.
The IMTC, led by a public agency and responding to local congestion concerns by pursuing national funds to address bi-national transportation issues, provides a model for ways to support the development of ITS freight projects across international borders. This successful model involves interactions with federal, provincial, state, and local governments from two countries to obtain funding and deploy border ITS projects in response to a broad range of border transportation goals that the ITMC has set for the region. Without the IMTC’s support and coordination, this border project would have taken longer and possibly cost more.
Author: M. JENSEN , E. WIK , C. HOFF , D. STOCK , C. MITCHELL
Published By: U.S. Department of Transportation
Source Date: 10/1/2003
EDL Number: 13952
Other Reference Number: FHWA-OP-03-XXXURL: http://ntl.bts.gov/lib//jpodocs/repts_te//13952.html
Average User Rating
Lesson of the Month for October, 2005 !
Intelligent Transportation Systems > Intermodal Freight > Freight Tracking
Intelligent Transportation Systems > Commercial Vehicle Operations > Electronic Screening > Credential Checking
Intelligent Transportation Systems > Commercial Vehicle Operations > Electronic Screening > Border Clearance
electronic credentials verification