Adopt a performance-based, proactive approach to traffic signal system operations in order to maximize operational efficiency.
The City of Minneapolis Department of Public Works' experience.
- There is no measure of system health or performance
- The current approach is reactive
- A good foundation exists
- There are inadequate personnel levels
- The regional focus is limited and opportunity exists
- Adopt a performance-based approach. Currently, the city of Minneapolis does not routinely measure system performance, and it has no baselines for knowing how well the system is serving the travelers' needs. The city should institute a program of frequent, planned system performance measurement, such as a report card. This report card could include measurements such as travel times and travel time variability. It should also include how well the system components are maintained, their operational status, and how long it takes to make repairs. As part of this effort, each individual signal on critical corridors should be reviewed and updated at least every three years.
Performance measures provide a baseline for assessing system operations over time, and indicate areas where improvement is needed. In addition, performance measures can be can be used to focus limited resources on the areas that would derive the greatest benefit, and report cards detailing system performance can be a useful communication tool to share with city leaders and the public.
- Adopt a proactive approach. Rather than simply reacting to problems as they arise, the city must seek to anticipate and accommodate changes as quickly as possible. The adoption of a proactive approach goes hand in hand with a performance based approach. Through assessing all the signals in the system, it will be possible to determine the appropriate action for each, and to make adjustments before a problem arises. Actions might include signal retiming, physical modifications to improve traffic flow or other techniques to maximize efficiency. The assessment might also reveal that certain signals at less traveled intersections are not needed. Consideration should be given to the possibility that motorists might benefit by another form of right of way assignment; in addition, this would also result in costs-savings for the city.
As part of a proactive approach, the city must try to include more signal system work in its construction plans. A closer relationship with construction projects could result in more signal system work (including installation, hardware/software upgrades, updated timing) being included in construction projects. Moreover, any construction project should be required to ensure that traffic signals are in working order after the construction is completed. In Minneapolis, the SCOOT traffic adaptive signal system has been out of operation for many months due to a construction project.
In order to be more effective, the city also must develop predetermined plans of action ready to respond to situations as they develop. In Minneapolis, some of these plans exist, but they have not been used due to a lack of personnel and expertise.
Author: National Transportation Operations Coalition Traffic Signal Action Team (NTOC), in association with AASHTO, ITE, ITS America, APWA, FHWA and University of Maryland
Published By: National Transportation Operations Coalition Traffic Signal Action Team (NTOC)
Source Date: February, 2004URL: http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/council/2004-meetings/20040618/Docs/Traffic_Signal_Assessment.pdf
Average User Rating